To recruit other people in to the study. Staff followed a script to
To recruit other folks into the study. Employees followed a script to train PF-915275 Participants (“recruiters”) the best way to recruit other people. Consistent with advised protocols for studies applying RDS (Centers for Disease Handle and Prevention [CDC], 202; Johnston Sabin, 2008a, 2008b; Lansky Mastro, 2008), the script incorporated the following information and facts for recruiters: a) recruitment is completely voluntary; b) they can give the coupons to up to 3 people today who inject drugs; c) they should refer individuals who have not currently received a coupon; PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24722005 d) coupons can’t be replaced if lost or not redeemed; e) the coupon expires 1 month immediately after the recruiter receives it ; f) they will acquire 0 for every single individual (as much as 3 men and women) who qualify for the study and full the survey; g) they are able to call project staff to confirm if their coupons have been redeemed and come in person to obtain payment only on Tuesdays; h) study employees use a coupon tracking program to confirm referrals; i) study staff is not going to disclose names or identity of referrals who participated to be able to protect allAuthor Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptInt J Drug Policy. Author manuscript; readily available in PMC 206 September 0.Mosher et al.Pageparticipants’ confidentiality; j) they must tell every single possible recruit regarding the study, how extended the survey requires, that recruits want to schedule an appointment to take the survey and bring their ID and coupon towards the study web site on the day of their survey; and k) they or their recruits can contact project staff with questions or issues about the method. Participants were nicely informed in regards to the study prior to recruiting peers by means of their own informed consent course of action and their very own experiences. Ethical and Regulatory Considerations To address ethical concerns recognized in the literature, the study implemented all protocols recommended by Semaan et al. (2009) described above and added other folks. For example, days for coupon reimbursement had been restricted to Tuesdays in order to discourage recruiters from accompanying recruits for the study site around the day in the survey. This also helped to guard recruits’ confidentiality regarding their participation within the study.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptThis study was not originally designed to examine ethical problems in peer recruitment through RDS, but rather on understanding recruitment networks and approaches so that you can test the validity of RDS statistical inference models’ underlying assumptions in regards to the peer recruitment course of action and network structure. Having said that, midway via information collection, the indepth interviews with participants revealed prevalent patterns of persistent recruitment methods recruiters utilised to ensure that peers would comply with by way of and enroll inside the study. It was unclear how recruits seasoned these various techniques and regardless of whether recruits perceived undue pressure to participate mainly because of their connection with the recruiters or the kind of recruitment tactics used. Because ethical issues connected to potentially coercive and overzealous peer recruitment in RDS happen to be raised within the literature, we believed it crucial to explore in a lot more detail how recruits perceived these recruitment practices plus the extent to which these practices decreased participants’ autonomy andor elevated their perceived dangers if they did not take part in the study following getting provided a coupon by a peer. Thus, in the second half with the indepth interviews, w.