Ailed.Pulldown ProtocolRNA probes containing the wild-type 25-bp region and a scrambled version of the same sequence (as negative control) were obtained by chemical synthesis from Sigma-Aldrich; as control of the RNA precipitation an unrelated small RNA oligonucleotide was used (wild type ATM 59-UGGCCAGGUAAGUGAUAUAU-39) [35]. The pulldown protocol has been described in detail by Sevo and colleagues [36]. AKT inhibitor 2 web Briefly, 500 pmoles of the target RNA were placed in a 400-mL reaction mixture containing 100 mM NaOAC pH 5.0 and 5 mM sodium m-periodate (Sigma-Aldrich), incubated for 1 hour in the dark at room temperature, ethanol precipitated, and resuspended in 100 mL of 0.1 M NaOAC, pH 5.0. To this RNA, 100 mL of adipic acid dehydrazide agarose bead (50 slurry, Sigma-Aldrich) equilibrated in 100 mM NaOAC pH 5.0 were added, and the mixG-runs Regulating FGG Pseudoexon InclusionFigure 5. Functional dissection of G-run elements within the pseudoexon sequence. (top) The complete 75-bp-long pseudoexon sequence and flanking splice sites; nucleotides belonging to the pseudoexon are in capital letters; the star indicates the IVS6-320A.T mutation; the deleted sequences (shaded in gray) are indicated. (bottom) Histograms representing the SPDP biological activity relative amount of transcripts including or skipping the pseudoexon, calculated for each deletion mutant as described in the legend of Figure 2B. Bars represent mean 6 SD of 3 independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. The results were analyzed by unpaired t-test. Statistical significance was calculated referring to the M construct (*P,0.05; **P,0.01; ***P,0.001). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059333.gG-runs Regulating FGG Pseudoexon Inclusionwas incubated for 12 hours at 4uC on a rotator. RNA beads were then washed with 2 M NaCl and equilibrated in washing buffer (5 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.8 mM magnesium acetate). The beads were then incubated on a rotator with a protein mixture containing approximately 1 mg of HeLa cell nuclear 
extract (Cil Biotech, Mons, Belgium) for 30 minutes at room temperature in 1 mL final volume. The beads were subsequently pelleted by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 3 minutes and washed 4 times with 1.5 mL of washing buffer, before addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer and loading on a 10 SDS-PAGE gel. The samples were analyzed by Western blotting with a general antibody against SR proteins (1H4, Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA, USA) and several home-made antibodies against hnRNP A/B and hnRNP H/F, previously described in our studies [37].performed on cDNA of cells co-transfected with the SRp40 and the minigene M constructs by 
using a FAM-labeled primer. RTPCR products were separated by capillary electrophoresis on a 3130XL genetic analyzer. Histograms represent the relative amount of transcripts including or skipping the pseudoexon, as assessed by calculating the ratio of the corresponding fluorescence peak areas (setting the sum of all peaks as 100 ). Bars represent mean 6 SD of 3 independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. The results were analyzed by unpaired t-test. (TIF)Figure S4 Differences in hnRNP F expression might account for cell-specific inclusion levels of FGG pseudoexon. (A) Western blot (left) and corresponding densitometric analysis (middle) demonstrating the endogenous expression levels of hnRNP F protein in both HeLa and HepG2 cells. (right) Relative expression levels of hnRNP F mRNA by qRT-PCR in the two cell lines. (B) Histogram.Ailed.Pulldown ProtocolRNA probes containing the wild-type 25-bp region and a scrambled version of the same sequence (as negative control) were obtained by chemical synthesis from Sigma-Aldrich; as control of the RNA precipitation an unrelated small RNA oligonucleotide was used (wild type ATM 59-UGGCCAGGUAAGUGAUAUAU-39) [35]. The pulldown protocol has been described in detail by Sevo and colleagues [36]. Briefly, 500 pmoles of the target RNA were placed in a 400-mL reaction mixture containing 100 mM NaOAC pH 5.0 and 5 mM sodium m-periodate (Sigma-Aldrich), incubated for 1 hour in the dark at room temperature, ethanol precipitated, and resuspended in 100 mL of 0.1 M NaOAC, pH 5.0. To this RNA, 100 mL of adipic acid dehydrazide agarose bead (50 slurry, Sigma-Aldrich) equilibrated in 100 mM NaOAC pH 5.0 were added, and the mixG-runs Regulating FGG Pseudoexon InclusionFigure 5. Functional dissection of G-run elements within the pseudoexon sequence. (top) The complete 75-bp-long pseudoexon sequence and flanking splice sites; nucleotides belonging to the pseudoexon are in capital letters; the star indicates the IVS6-320A.T mutation; the deleted sequences (shaded in gray) are indicated. (bottom) Histograms representing the relative amount of transcripts including or skipping the pseudoexon, calculated for each deletion mutant as described in the legend of Figure 2B. Bars represent mean 6 SD of 3 independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. The results were analyzed by unpaired t-test. Statistical significance was calculated referring to the M construct (*P,0.05; **P,0.01; ***P,0.001). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059333.gG-runs Regulating FGG Pseudoexon Inclusionwas incubated for 12 hours at 4uC on a rotator. RNA beads were then washed with 2 M NaCl and equilibrated in washing buffer (5 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.8 mM magnesium acetate). The beads were then incubated on a rotator with a protein mixture containing approximately 1 mg of HeLa cell nuclear extract (Cil Biotech, Mons, Belgium) for 30 minutes at room temperature in 1 mL final volume. The beads were subsequently pelleted by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 3 minutes and washed 4 times with 1.5 mL of washing buffer, before addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer and loading on a 10 SDS-PAGE gel. The samples were analyzed by Western blotting with a general antibody against SR proteins (1H4, Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA, USA) and several home-made antibodies against hnRNP A/B and hnRNP H/F, previously described in our studies [37].performed on cDNA of cells co-transfected with the SRp40 and the minigene M constructs by using a FAM-labeled primer. RTPCR products were separated by capillary electrophoresis on a 3130XL genetic analyzer. Histograms represent the relative amount of transcripts including or skipping the pseudoexon, as assessed by calculating the ratio of the corresponding fluorescence peak areas (setting the sum of all peaks as 100 ). Bars represent mean 6 SD of 3 independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. The results were analyzed by unpaired t-test. (TIF)Figure S4 Differences in hnRNP F expression might account for cell-specific inclusion levels of FGG pseudoexon. (A) Western blot (left) and corresponding densitometric analysis (middle) demonstrating the endogenous expression levels of hnRNP F protein in both HeLa and HepG2 cells. (right) Relative expression levels of hnRNP F mRNA by qRT-PCR in the two cell lines. (B) Histogram.