Hese tissues. In tissues that were productively MedChemExpress AN-3199 infected we evaluated the efficiency of this infection by measuring the release of p24 in the culture medium and by enumerating p24+ CD4 T cells with flow cytometry. By both these criteria there were no statistically significant differences between tissues inoculated with C/R and T/F HIV-1 variants. T cell depletion is a hallmark of HIV-1 infection. All HIV-1 variants employed here significantly deplete cervical tissue of CD4 T cells, and with similar efficiency. As expected the magnitude of T cell depletion is proportional to the efficiency of infection, in our case 
to the number of infected cells in the tissue. 12926553 Neither when we compared CD4 T cell depletion in NL-SF162.ecto?and NL1051.TD12.ecto nfected donor matched tissues, nor when we compared all T/F and C/R HIV-1 variants as groups, were there statistically significant differences. It is known that activated CD4 T cells preferentially support productive HIV-1 infection and that HIV-1 infection may activate bystander cells [15]. This was confirmed in this study: there were more activated cells (as evaluated by the expression of various activation markers) among HIV-1 infected T cells than in controls. Both T/F and C/R HIV-1 variants replicated predominantly in these activated cells. And again, neither when we compared CD4 T cell activation in NL-SF162 ecto?and NL-1051.TD12.ecto?infected donor matched tissues, nor when we compared all T/F and C/R HIV-1 variants, was there a general difference in CD4 T cell activation. Thus, the biological properties of T/F and C/R HIV-1 variants as revealed in their infection of cervical tissues ex vivo were similar. Obviously, it is possible that the subtle differences between the T/ F and C/R HIV-1 variants are not revealed in ex vivo tissues, which, although closer to the in vivo situation than isolated cell cultures may fail to reflect important systemic factors such as recruitment of new cells to the site of infection, cell trafficking to the draining lymph nodes, etc. Moreover, unlike in vivo, the tissue is not polarized and thus the inner cells are not protected by the epithelial layer, although according to some studies HIV-1 is transmitted directly to cell targets in the inner layers through lesions in the epithelium [16]. If this is the case, our tissue model faithfully represents the in vivo situation. In this study we focused on the infection of cervical T cells, which have also been reported to be the earliest detectable infected cells in 
human buy Solvent Yellow 14 genital mucosa ex-vivo [17]. However, according to some reports dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages also may play an important role in the early events of HIV infection. Unlikeintestinal macrophages, genital mucosal macrophages are permissive to HIV-1 productive infection [18] and are thought to play a role in the early events of HIV transmission [19]. In the vagina, the initial infection is established in the outer epithelium where intraepithelial T cells bind and take up HIV-1 independently of Langerhans cells [20]. The latter, while they remain nonproductively infected, can mediate the infection of T cells [21]. Simillarly, DCs that have captured HIV-1 through their sugar binding receptors [22] can transfer the virus through viral synapses [23], to remote CD4 T cells [24?6]. Nevertheless, a direct evidence for the implication of mucosal dendritic cells in the transmission of HIV-1 in vivo is still lacking. Moreover, in the studies of SIV transmi.Hese tissues. In tissues that were productively infected we evaluated the efficiency of this infection by measuring the release of p24 in the culture medium and by enumerating p24+ CD4 T cells with flow cytometry. By both these criteria there were no statistically significant differences between tissues inoculated with C/R and T/F HIV-1 variants. T cell depletion is a hallmark of HIV-1 infection. All HIV-1 variants employed here significantly deplete cervical tissue of CD4 T cells, and with similar efficiency. As expected the magnitude of T cell depletion is proportional to the efficiency of infection, in our case to the number of infected cells in the tissue. 12926553 Neither when we compared CD4 T cell depletion in NL-SF162.ecto?and NL1051.TD12.ecto nfected donor matched tissues, nor when we compared all T/F and C/R HIV-1 variants as groups, were there statistically significant differences. It is known that activated CD4 T cells preferentially support productive HIV-1 infection and that HIV-1 infection may activate bystander cells [15]. This was confirmed in this study: there were more activated cells (as evaluated by the expression of various activation markers) among HIV-1 infected T cells than in controls. Both T/F and C/R HIV-1 variants replicated predominantly in these activated cells. And again, neither when we compared CD4 T cell activation in NL-SF162 ecto?and NL-1051.TD12.ecto?infected donor matched tissues, nor when we compared all T/F and C/R HIV-1 variants, was there a general difference in CD4 T cell activation. Thus, the biological properties of T/F and C/R HIV-1 variants as revealed in their infection of cervical tissues ex vivo were similar. Obviously, it is possible that the subtle differences between the T/ F and C/R HIV-1 variants are not revealed in ex vivo tissues, which, although closer to the in vivo situation than isolated cell cultures may fail to reflect important systemic factors such as recruitment of new cells to the site of infection, cell trafficking to the draining lymph nodes, etc. Moreover, unlike in vivo, the tissue is not polarized and thus the inner cells are not protected by the epithelial layer, although according to some studies HIV-1 is transmitted directly to cell targets in the inner layers through lesions in the epithelium [16]. If this is the case, our tissue model faithfully represents the in vivo situation. In this study we focused on the infection of cervical T cells, which have also been reported to be the earliest detectable infected cells in human genital mucosa ex-vivo [17]. However, according to some reports dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages also may play an important role in the early events of HIV infection. Unlikeintestinal macrophages, genital mucosal macrophages are permissive to HIV-1 productive infection [18] and are thought to play a role in the early events of HIV transmission [19]. In the vagina, the initial infection is established in the outer epithelium where intraepithelial T cells bind and take up HIV-1 independently of Langerhans cells [20]. The latter, while they remain nonproductively infected, can mediate the infection of T cells [21]. Simillarly, DCs that have captured HIV-1 through their sugar binding receptors [22] can transfer the virus through viral synapses [23], to remote CD4 T cells [24?6]. Nevertheless, a direct evidence for the implication of mucosal dendritic cells in the transmission of HIV-1 in vivo is still lacking. Moreover, in the studies of SIV transmi.