Sive (91.5 )and GSK-126 active (91.9 ) touch blocks [F(1,34) < 1, p = 0.784]. The interJW-55 action between delay and action was marginally significant [F(1,34) = 3.6, p = 0.065], and indicated that performance improvement in delayed touch trials was present in active touch blocks [F(1,34) = 10.0, p = 0.003] but absent in passive touch blocks [F(1,34) 
< 1, p = 0.521]. Choices of which hand felt the more intense touch in sameintensity trials can be seen in Figure 2A. When touch on both hands or on neither hand were observed, choices between the left and the right hand were around chance (50 ). Observers were more likely to choose one of the hands in trials in which only one of the hands was seen to receive touch. Specifically, they were more likely to choose their left hand as having felt the more intense touch when they viewed touch on the left hand, and to choose their right hand as having felt the more intense touch when they viewed touch on the right hand. This tendency was only present in active touch blocks and it was particularly pronounced when felt touches were concurrent with observed touches. For all trials in which the left (right) hand was chosen as having felt the more intense touch, statistical analyses compared the frequency of trials in which touch on both hands or touch on neither of the hands was observed (collapsed data) to the frequency of trials in which touch was observed on the left (right) hand. Comparisons were made in separate repeated-measures ANOVAs for the within-subject factors touch (touch both/none vs. touch left; touch both/none vs. touch right), action (passive vs. active touch trials), and delay (concurrent vs. delayed touch trials). For trials in which the left hand was chosen as feeling theFIGURE 2 | Visual remapping of touch effects for Experiment 1 (A) and Experiment 2 (B). Bars show the proportion of trials in which the left hand was chosen as feeling the more intense touch as a function of observing touch (A)/dots (B) on the left hand (dark gray bars), on the right hand (black bars) or on both or neither hands (light gray bars) for all conditions of action [(A) only] and delay. Error bars denote standard error of the means. Theseproportions are around chance (50 ) when observing touch/dots on both hands or none. Proportions above those reflect VRT effects from observing left hand touch/dots (dark gray bars) and proportions below those reflect VRT effects from observing right hand touch/dots (black bars). Single asterisks denote significant pairwise comparisons at the 0.05 level. Double asterisk indicates significant pairwise comparison at the 0.005 level.www.frontiersin.orgFebruary 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 95 |GillmeisterPerceptual mirror PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19901140 touch for handsmore intense touch (see Figure 2A, dark gray bars vs. light gray bars), Bonferroni-adjusted planned pairwise comparisons of the estimated marginal means of trial frequencies for each combination of touch, action, and delay showed that the left hand was chosen significantly more often when touch on the left hand was observed 
than when touch on both hands or none was observed only when the felt tactile stimulus was concurrent with the viewed active touch [F(1,34) = 11.0, p = 0.002, 2 = 0.245] but not when it p was delayed [F(1,34) < 1, p = 0.600, 2 = 0.008] or when (concurp rent or delayed) passive touch was viewed [F(1,34) < 1, p 0.561, 2 0.010]. p A similar pattern was found in the planned pairwise comparisons for trials in which the right hand was chosen as.Sive (91.5 )and active (91.9 ) touch blocks [F(1,34) < 1, p = 0.784]. The interaction between delay and action was marginally significant [F(1,34) = 3.6, p = 0.065], and indicated that performance improvement in delayed touch trials was present in active touch blocks [F(1,34) = 10.0, p = 0.003] but absent in passive touch blocks [F(1,34) < 1, p = 0.521]. Choices of which hand felt the more intense touch in sameintensity trials can be seen in Figure 2A. When touch on both hands or on neither hand were observed, choices between the left and the right hand were around chance (50 ). Observers were more likely to choose one of the hands in trials in which only one of the hands was seen to receive touch. Specifically, they were more likely to choose their left hand as having felt the more intense touch when they viewed touch on the left hand, and to choose their right hand as having felt the more intense touch when they viewed touch on the right hand. This tendency was only present in active touch blocks and it was particularly pronounced when felt touches were concurrent with observed touches. For all trials in which the left (right) hand was chosen as having felt the more intense touch, statistical analyses compared the frequency of trials in which touch on both hands or touch on neither of the hands was observed (collapsed data) to the frequency of trials in which touch was observed on the left (right) hand. Comparisons were made in separate repeated-measures ANOVAs for the within-subject factors touch (touch both/none vs. touch left; touch both/none vs. touch right), action (passive vs. active touch trials), and delay (concurrent vs. delayed touch trials). For trials in which the left hand was chosen as feeling theFIGURE 2 | Visual remapping of touch effects for Experiment 1 (A) and Experiment 2 (B). Bars show the proportion of trials in which the left hand was chosen as feeling the more intense touch as a function of observing touch (A)/dots (B) on the left hand (dark gray bars), on the right hand (black bars) or on both or neither hands (light gray bars) for all conditions of action [(A) only] and delay. Error bars denote standard error of the means. Theseproportions are around chance (50 ) when observing touch/dots on both hands or none. Proportions above those reflect VRT effects from observing left hand touch/dots (dark gray bars) and proportions below those reflect VRT effects from observing right hand touch/dots (black bars). Single asterisks denote significant pairwise comparisons at the 0.05 level. Double asterisk indicates significant pairwise comparison at the 0.005 level.www.frontiersin.orgFebruary 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 95 |GillmeisterPerceptual mirror PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19901140 touch for handsmore intense touch (see Figure 2A, dark gray bars vs. light gray bars), Bonferroni-adjusted planned pairwise comparisons of the estimated marginal means of trial frequencies for each combination of touch, action, and delay showed that the left hand was chosen significantly more often when touch on the left hand was observed than when touch on both hands or none was observed only when the felt tactile stimulus was concurrent with the viewed active touch [F(1,34) = 11.0, p = 0.002, 2 = 0.245] but not when it p was delayed [F(1,34) < 1, p = 0.600, 2 = 0.008] or when (concurp rent or delayed) passive touch was viewed [F(1,34) < 1, p 0.561, 2 0.010]. p A similar pattern was found in the planned pairwise comparisons for trials in which the right hand was chosen as.