R because a high percentage of women who test positive for HPV do not return for cytology or due to the handling of samples when taking a E7389 mesylate sample for cytology from all patients at the first visit. In addition, because it prevents automatization, it seems impractical. The simultaneous use of HC2 for high-risk viruses with a molecular method that distinguishes CIN2+ from CIN12 would increase the SQ 34676 web specificity and the PPV, with the advantages of being faster and having the potential to be automated compared to triaged cytology. Of the markers associated with CC, p16, a tumor suppressor protein, is the most studied [11]. This protein accumulates in the nucleus and cytoplasm of cells transformed by high-risk HPVs and is usually detected by IH. The amount of p16 is related to the severity of cervical neoplasia and is considered a marker of CIN2+. P16 has been successfully deployed for the classification of HPVrelated disease. For cervical tissue punch and cone biopsies, IH for p16 has been reported to reduce interobserver disagreement when compared with diagnosis of H E stained sections. P16 has also recently emerged as a sensitive and specific diagnostic adjunct for underlying CIN2+ lesions in cervical cytology specimens [11]. It consistently exhibits high sensitivity (80?5 ) for detection of CIN2+; however, the specificity is lower than that for cytology (,50 ) [50,51]. This is because approximately 38 of low-grade CIN lesions, those infected with high-risk HPV types, express this marker [50]. The relatively low specificity of this marker and the need for a pathologist to interpret the IH are the main reasons why this marker has not been adopted for primary screening. Recently,Mitosis as Source of Biomarkers in Cervical CancerFigure 8. Canonical pathways where deregulated genes are involved. Top 25 canonical pathways identified in the set of 997 deregulated genes between the tumors and controls (A) and in the subset of the 100 best-ranked genes (50 upregulated and 50 downregulated; B). The canonical pathways were identified using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) system. The 2log (p-value) (blue bars) and the ratio (yellow dots) were calculated by comparing the number of genes in the pathways present in the datasets versus the human database. The p-value was calculated using the chi square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate, and the -log (p-value) values .1.3 (red line) correspond to p,0.05. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055975.gMitosis as Source of Biomarkers in Cervical CancerTable 5. DAVID functional annotation cluster analysis at the highest stringency of 997 genes deregulated in cervical cancer*.ClusterEnrichment Score 16.Biological Process Mitosis ?nuclear division M phase of mitotic cell cycle organelle fissionNo. Genes 54 54 54 54 28 28 28 28 49 6 6 11 7 7 52 52 14 14 10 10 8 6 6 4 4 4 4 11 11 4p-value 3.00E-17 3.00E-17 6.80E-17 1.90E-16 3.60E-15 2.90E-14 1.90E-06 1.90E-06 1.90E-04 3.90E-04 1.20E-02 1.50E-03 3.70E-03 6.90E-03 8.70E-03 1.20E-02 1.00E-02 1.00E-02 3.00E-03 3.50E-02 2.00E-02 4.90E-03 4.90E-02 1.20E-02 1.40E-01 1.20E-02 2.40E-02 3.20E-02 5.30E-02 3.90E-02 4.90E-Fold Change 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.6 6.3 5.9 2.8 2.8 1.7 8.3 4.2 3.3 4.5 4.0 1.4 1.4 2.2 2.2 3.3 2.2 2.8 5.1 3.0 7.6 3.1 7.6 6.1 2.1 2.0 5.1 4.14.positive regulation of ubiquitin-protein ligase activity during mitotic cell cycle positive regulation of ligase activity5.RNA splicing, via transesterification reactions nuclear mRNA splicing, via spliceosome43.66 3.positiv.R because a high percentage of women who test positive for HPV do not return for cytology or due to the handling of samples when taking a sample for cytology from all patients at the first visit. In addition, because it prevents automatization, it seems impractical. The simultaneous use of HC2 for high-risk viruses with a molecular method that distinguishes CIN2+ from CIN12 would increase the specificity and the PPV, with the advantages of being faster and having the potential to be automated compared to triaged cytology. Of the markers associated with CC, p16, a tumor suppressor protein, is the most studied [11]. This protein accumulates in the nucleus and cytoplasm of cells transformed by high-risk HPVs and is usually detected by IH. The amount of p16 is related to the severity of cervical neoplasia and is considered a marker of CIN2+. P16 has been successfully deployed for the classification of HPVrelated disease. For cervical tissue punch and cone biopsies, IH for p16 has been reported to reduce interobserver disagreement when compared with diagnosis of H E stained sections. P16 has also recently emerged as a sensitive and specific diagnostic adjunct for underlying CIN2+ lesions in cervical cytology specimens [11]. It consistently exhibits high sensitivity (80?5 ) for detection of CIN2+; however, the specificity is lower than that for cytology (,50 ) [50,51]. This is because approximately 38 of low-grade CIN lesions, those infected with high-risk HPV types, express this marker [50]. The relatively low specificity of this marker and the need for a pathologist to interpret the IH are the main reasons why this marker has not been adopted for primary screening. Recently,Mitosis as Source of Biomarkers in Cervical CancerFigure 8. Canonical pathways where deregulated genes are involved. Top 25 canonical pathways identified in the set of 997 deregulated genes between the tumors and controls (A) and in the subset of the 100 best-ranked genes (50 upregulated and 50 downregulated; B). The canonical pathways were identified using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) system. The 2log (p-value) (blue bars) and the ratio (yellow dots) were calculated by comparing the number of genes in the pathways present in the datasets versus the human database. The p-value was calculated using the chi square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate, and the -log (p-value) values .1.3 (red line) correspond to p,0.05. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055975.gMitosis as Source of Biomarkers in Cervical CancerTable 5. DAVID functional annotation cluster analysis at the highest stringency of 997 genes deregulated in cervical cancer*.ClusterEnrichment Score 16.Biological Process Mitosis ?nuclear division M phase of mitotic cell cycle organelle fissionNo. Genes 54 54 54 54 28 28 28 28 49 6 6 11 7 7 52 52 14 14 10 10 8 6 6 4 4 4 4 11 11 4p-value 3.00E-17 3.00E-17 6.80E-17 1.90E-16 3.60E-15 2.90E-14 1.90E-06 1.90E-06 1.90E-04 3.90E-04 1.20E-02 1.50E-03 3.70E-03 6.90E-03 8.70E-03 1.20E-02 1.00E-02 1.00E-02 3.00E-03 3.50E-02 2.00E-02 4.90E-03 4.90E-02 1.20E-02 1.40E-01 1.20E-02 2.40E-02 3.20E-02 5.30E-02 3.90E-02 4.90E-Fold Change 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.6 6.3 5.9 2.8 2.8 1.7 8.3 4.2 3.3 4.5 4.0 1.4 1.4 2.2 2.2 3.3 2.2 2.8 5.1 3.0 7.6 3.1 7.6 6.1 2.1 2.0 5.1 4.14.positive regulation of ubiquitin-protein ligase activity during mitotic cell cycle positive regulation of ligase activity5.RNA splicing, via transesterification reactions nuclear mRNA splicing, via spliceosome43.66 3.positiv.