E Mikrotia fauna–because the particular abundance of this giant murid48–is composed of a full range of other giant rodents (the dormouse Stertomys and the hamster Hattomys), the giant erinaceid Deinogalerix (Fig. 2B), crocodiles, chelonians, amphibians and birds29,64?6. Practically all mammals of the Gargano show extraordinary morphological signs of insularity20 such as, among others, the presence of aberrant and giant forms among the micromammals29. Despite its long history of scientific study, palaeontologists and evolutionary biologists consider Hoplitomeryx as one of the most controversial topics of current interest. Some of this disputation focuses on the number of genera and species erected, with some authors23 considering 1 (type) genus and 6 species (Hoplitomeryx matthei [type species], H. apruthiensis, H. apulicus, H. falcidens, H. magnus, and H. minutus) while others22 willing to accept as many as 2 genera (Hoplitomeryx and Scontronmeryx) and 10 species (Hoplitomeryx matthei [type species], H. devosi, H. macpheei and H. kriegsmani, and Scontronmeryx minutus [type species], S. apruthiensis, S. apulicus, S. falcidens, S. magnus and S. mazzai) from the same fossil material. As the mainland ancestors of Hoplitomeryx are unknown, another focus of controversy concerns its phylogenetic and–still unresolved–link within Ruminantia. By showing two lacrimal PD173074 site orifices and closed metatarsal gulleys, it was originally accommodated in the Cervoidea19. Hoplitomeryx, however, does not possess antlers, the most characteristic feature of cervids, as its cranial appendages are unpaired, non-deciduous and unbranched. As a consequence, a more recent overview of its systematic position24 provided findings for linking it as either between antilocaprids and bovids, or antilocaprids and giraffids, since a supposed ancient origin (in the Late Oligocene or Early Miocene) failed to accomodate it in any of the advanced ruminant lineages. The last Synergisidin solubility matter of conjecture is when and how the Hoplitomeryx ancestors reached the palaeo-island. A mode of colonization by land-bridges that connected Gargano with the Balkans across the Adriatic Sea in the Late Oligocene is embraced by some authors25,26, while sweepstake dispersals at the end of the Late Miocene are considered by others27,28. The material studied consists of teeth of Hoplitomeryx from the paleo-island of Gargano. The following 4 species have been recognized on the basis of evident differences in size and certain morphological variation of teeth (Supplementary Fig. S1), without formally naming them–as there is difficulty to reliably assign morphotypes to any of the Hoplitomeryx spp. because of the lack of detailed studies comprising upper dentition. It has been thus recognized in increased order of size: Hoplitomeryx sp. 1, Hoplitomeryx sp. 2, Hoplitomeryx sp. 3, and Hoplitomeryx sp. 4. The material considered for analysis belongs to 28 different localities, distributed in 6 different biozones (Supplementary Table S1)44,65,66. All specimens are housed at the Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden (the Netherlands).The insular fauna of Gargano and the case of Hoplitomeryx. The Mediterranean is an area of intenseDataset.Long-term patterns of tooth wear. To evaluate whether and how Hoplitomeryx species resulted in explosive evolutionary radiation and flourished in a variety of ecological settings, the tooth-based mesowear methodScientific RepoRts | 6:29803 | DOI: 10.1038/srepwww.nature.com/scientificrep.E Mikrotia fauna–because the particular abundance of this giant murid48–is composed of a full range of other giant rodents (the dormouse Stertomys and the hamster Hattomys), the giant erinaceid Deinogalerix (Fig. 2B), crocodiles, chelonians, amphibians and birds29,64?6. Practically all mammals of the Gargano show extraordinary morphological signs of insularity20 such as, among others, the presence of aberrant and giant forms among the micromammals29. Despite its long history of scientific study, palaeontologists and evolutionary biologists consider Hoplitomeryx as one of the most controversial topics of current interest. Some of this disputation focuses on the number of genera and species erected, with some authors23 considering 1 (type) genus and 6 species (Hoplitomeryx matthei [type species], H. apruthiensis, H. apulicus, H. falcidens, H. magnus, and H. minutus) while others22 willing to accept as many as 2 genera (Hoplitomeryx and Scontronmeryx) and 10 species (Hoplitomeryx matthei [type species], H. devosi, H. macpheei and H. kriegsmani, and Scontronmeryx minutus [type species], S. apruthiensis, S. apulicus, S. falcidens, S. magnus and S. mazzai) from the same fossil material. As the mainland ancestors of Hoplitomeryx are unknown, another focus of controversy concerns its phylogenetic and–still unresolved–link within Ruminantia. By showing two lacrimal orifices and closed metatarsal gulleys, it was originally accommodated in the Cervoidea19. Hoplitomeryx, however, does not possess antlers, the most characteristic feature of cervids, as its cranial appendages are unpaired, non-deciduous and unbranched. As a consequence, a more recent overview of its systematic position24 provided findings for linking it as either between antilocaprids and bovids, or antilocaprids and giraffids, since a supposed ancient origin (in the Late Oligocene or Early Miocene) failed to accomodate it in any of the advanced ruminant lineages. The last matter of conjecture is when and how the Hoplitomeryx ancestors reached the palaeo-island. A mode of colonization by land-bridges that connected Gargano with the Balkans across the Adriatic Sea in the Late Oligocene is embraced by some authors25,26, while sweepstake dispersals at the end of the Late Miocene are considered by others27,28. The material studied consists of teeth of Hoplitomeryx from the paleo-island of Gargano. The following 4 species have been recognized on the basis of evident differences in size and certain morphological variation of teeth (Supplementary Fig. S1), without formally naming them–as there is difficulty to reliably assign morphotypes to any of the Hoplitomeryx spp. because of the lack of detailed studies comprising upper dentition. It has been thus recognized in increased order of size: Hoplitomeryx sp. 1, Hoplitomeryx sp. 2, Hoplitomeryx sp. 3, and Hoplitomeryx sp. 4. The material considered for analysis belongs to 28 different localities, distributed in 6 different biozones (Supplementary Table S1)44,65,66. All specimens are housed at the Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden (the Netherlands).The insular fauna of Gargano and the case of Hoplitomeryx. The Mediterranean is an area of intenseDataset.Long-term patterns of tooth wear. To evaluate whether and how Hoplitomeryx species resulted in explosive evolutionary radiation and flourished in a variety of ecological settings, the tooth-based mesowear methodScientific RepoRts | 6:29803 | DOI: 10.1038/srepwww.nature.com/scientificrep.