Ts with low Diversity Library Storage Nutritional threat was 6.1 days (.5), while the mean LOS of sufferers with higher nutritional threat was eight.1 days (.9) (p = 0.098). NS-IBD resulted one of the most precise tools in pre-Nutrients 2021, 13, 3899 Nutrients 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW9 of 13 9 ofTable 5. Prevalence of high nutritional risk and SBP-3264 Purity & Documentation malnutrition diagnosis in IBD, CD and UC patients. IBD NS-IBD NRS-2002 Have to MST MIRT SASKIBD-NR Sensitivity 0.92 0.84 0.six 0.six 0.84 0.52 95 CI 0.72.98 0.63.95 0.39.78 0.39.78 0.63.95 0.31.72 Specificity 0.73 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.95 95 CI 0.56.86 0.77.98 0.84.99 0.84.99 0.77.98 0.80.99 CD NS-IBD NRS-2002 Need to MST MIRT SASKIBD-NR Sensitivity 0.86 0.8 0.53 0.6 0.8 0.6 95 CI 0.58.97 0.51.94 0.27.77 0.32.82 0.51.94 0.32.82 Specificity 0.77 0.93 1 1 0.93 0.96 95 CI 0.58.89 0.77.98 0.86 0.86 0.77.98 0.81.99 UC NS-IBD NRS-2002 Must MST MIRT SASKIBD-NR Sensitivity 1 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.4 95 CI Specificity 95 CI PPV 95 CI NPV 95 CI Youden index 0.65 0.five 0.13.86 0.76 0.45.93 1 0.30 0.50 0.54.99 0.83 0.36.99 0.9 0.54.99 0.83 0.34.99 0.73 0.35.91 0.83 0.36.99 0.87 0.46.99 0.62 0.25.89 0.53 Figure 2. NS-IBD ROC Curve. IBD Nutritional Screening tool (NS-IBD); Receiver Operating Char0.27.86 0.83 0.36.99 0.85 0.42.99 0.55 0.22.84 0.43 acteristic 0.54.99 (ROC). 0.83 0.36.99 0.9 0.54.99 0.83 0.36.99 0.73 0.13.72 0.83 0.36.99 0.eight 0.29.98 0.45 0.18.75 0.23 PPV 0.65 0.85 1 1 0.85 0.9 95 CI 0.40.83 0.56.97 0.59 0.62 0.56.97 0.54.99 NPV 0.92 0.90 0.81 0.83 0.90 0.83 95 CI 0.73.98 0.73.97 0.65.91 0.67.93 0.73.97 0.66.93 Youden index 0.63 0.73 0.53 0.53 0.73 0.56 PPV 0.7 0.87 0.94 0.94 0.87 0.87 95 CI 0.51.84 0.66.97 0.68.99 0.68.99 0.66.97 0.58.98 NPV 0.93 0.89 0.78 0.78 0.89 0.74 95 CI 0.76.99 0.74.96 0.63.88 0.63.88 0.74.96 0.59.85 Youden index 0.65 0.76 0.57 0.57 0.76 0.Inflammatory bowel illness (IBD); Crohn’s disease (CD); Ulcerative colitis (UC); IBD Nutritional Screening tool (NS-IBD); Nutritional Danger Screening 2002 (NRS-2002); Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (Have to); Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST); Malnutrition Inflammation Assessing the relationship among the malnutrition risk along with the postoperative Threat Tool (MIRT); Saskatchewan IBD utrition Danger (SaskIBD-NR). length of keep (LOS) we found that according to NS-IBD, the mean LOS of patients with3.six. Postoperative Length of Stay and Nutritional Risklow nutritional danger was six.1 days (.5), when the mean LOS of patients with high nutri3.6. Postoperative Length of Remain (p = Nutritional Risk resulted the most correct tools in pretional danger was 8.1 days (.9) and 0.098). NS-IBD Assessing the partnership amongst the malnutrition threat along with the postoperative length dicting LOS (Figure 3). of stay (LOS) we found that according Crohn’s disease mean Ulcerative colitis with low Inflammatory bowel illness (IBD); to NS-IBD, the (CD); LOS of patients (UC); IBD nutritional risk was six.1tool (NS-IBD); Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002); MalnuNutritional Screening days (.5), although the mean LOS of patients with high nutritional danger was 8.1 days (Screening Tool (Ought to); Malnutrition most precise tools in predicting trition Universal .9) (p = 0.098). NS-IBD resulted the Screening Tool (MST); MalnutriLOS (Figure 3). tion Inflammation Risk Tool (MIRT); Saskatchewan IBD utrition Danger (SaskIBD-NR)Figure 3. Nutritional screening results in partnership towards the length of stay. Figure 3. Nutritional screening results in relationship towards the length of keep.IBD Nutritional Screening tool (NS-IBD); Nutriti.