P managers of shipyards, who have the highest weight inside the
P managers of shipyards, who’ve the highest weight in the final decision for investment in energy JPH203 web efficiency measures. Implementing the framework overcomes the bounded rationality barrier and assists DMs to make rational and optimal decisions Fmoc-Gly-Gly-OH In Vitro within a vague atmosphere regarding enhancing power efficiency. Additionally, following the PDCA cycle and taking into consideration the changeable DMs priorities contributes a dynamic feature for the framework. As a result of framework’s generic traits, it may be applied to other industries, and policy makers and researchers in those industries also can employ the framework to overcome barriers to improving energy efficiency. The following measures was taken to design and create the framework:Systematic literature overview on barriers of power efficiency from many sectors and industries; Evaluation and categorizing various barriers within the shipbuilding market; Design and style and develop the framework by categorizing the identified barriers in to 5 major disciplines;J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9,20 ofUsing two MCDM procedures (FAHP and FMAGDM) to understand the interaction among the barriers.To validate the proposed framework, a case study was carried out for an Iranian shipyard. Interviews have been performed with five senior managers in the shipyard, and their priorities in the categorized barriers in every discipline had been determined. Four criteria were presented to them for prioritizing the barriers, namely, how severe the barriers are, how uncomplicated it is to remove the barriers, how much influence the removal in the barriers can have on energy efficiency, and just how much impact the removal of your barriers can have on financial overall performance. By applying FAHP and FMAGDM, the priorities from the barriers have been identified in each discipline and generally elements. The outcomes show that:There is a substantial imbalance in between the value in the distinctive disciplines. Financial barriers would be the most important and are deemed to be 18 times additional essential than the least crucial discipline, i.e., barriers due to the human element. Within the criteria side, the most crucial issue for DMs could be the effect of “barriers removal to financial performance”. “Improvement of energy efficiency soon after barriers removal”, “simplicity of barriers removal”, and “severity of barriers” are ranked in order of importance”. The weights assigned for the disciplines have considerable effect on the final ranking from the barriers. Resulting from international sanctions, the yard has complications with financing and limited access to capital. Also, charges caused by disruptions of production is a further key barrier to implementing power efficiency measures in the yard. With regards to technological discipline, the principle barriers for the yard are “lack of appropriate technology in the yard”, “technical investment risk” and “immaturity of the technology”. “Lack of environmental policy from the government”, “lack of government incentives” and “lack of environmental policy from the company” are regarded to become the highest priority for the yard with regards to policy and regulations. The least critical barriers are related towards the human factor. The principle barriers within this discipline are “inappropriate organizational structure”, “lack of technical competence”, and “bounded rationality”.In an effort to overcome the barriers, the integration of the barriers has to be taken into account. Imbalances amongst the value of your disciplines can bring about a loss of prospective for improving energy efficiency. A.